Developments around Ukraine are torrential, with Moscow sending the message that the dialogue process with the United States has essentially frozen, attributing the responsibility to the American side and to the ongoing political support that the West provides to Kyiv. The Kremlin spokesman, Dmitry Peskov, stated that the dialogue that had started after the contacts between Vladimir Putin and Donald Trump is currently in a state of anticipation. According to him, Washington does not appear willing to discuss a broader framework of issues, choosing to wait for developments in the Ukrainian issue before proceeding to substantive negotiations. This positioning reinforces the assessment of Moscow that American policy continues to treat the conflict in Ukraine not as an issue requiring an immediate political solution, but as a tool for exercising pressure against Russia.
The Zelensky letter and the Putin reaction
Particular interest was caused by the public reference of Vladimir Putin to the open letter published by Volodymyr Zelensky, with which the Ukrainian president invited the Russian leader to a direct meeting to discuss a possible termination of the conflict. Putin revealed that he saw the letter during contacts with the president of Uzbekistan, Shavkat Mirziyoyev, noting that its content contained, in his view, elements of inappropriate political behavior and public confrontation. The Russian president argued that the publication of such messages does not contribute to diplomacy and that serious negotiations cannot be conducted through open letters and public statements. At the same time, he made it clear that he does not reject in advance the possibility of a meeting with Zelensky, but considers that such a meeting must have substantive content and not a symbolic character. It is not accidental that several Western governments rushed to publicly support the proposal of Zelensky and called on Moscow to respond. On the Russian side, however, this mobilization was considered yet another effort of political pressure towards the Kremlin through international public opinion.
Harsh Russian criticism of Kyiv: How to speak with child killers
Putin appeared particularly critical towards the Ukrainian leadership, arguing that there is a contradiction between the calls for dialogue and the military actions that continue on the field. According to the Russian narrative, the leadership of Kyiv seeks simultaneously to maintain open channels of communication and to strengthen the military confrontation, a fact which, as Moscow argues, complicates any effort for a political solution. The Russian president also exercised criticism on Zelensky for not conducting elections under current conditions, bringing back an argument that is frequently used by the Russian side to contest the democratic legitimacy of the Ukrainian leadership. "They ask for a meeting and commit horrible crimes such as the murder of children. What can this mean?" the Russian leader wondered.
NATO wrote the Zelensky letter
The Russian diplomacy appeared particularly critical towards the content of the letter. Konstantin Dolgov, ambassador at large of the Russian Ministry of Foreign Affairs, argued that the text does not contain any new proposal and repeats positions that Moscow has repeatedly rejected. According to Dolgov, the Ukrainian leadership continues to ignore the Russian positions and to insist on terms that cannot constitute a basis for negotiation. At the same time, he strongly criticized the tone of the letter, characterizing it as inappropriate for official communication between heads of state. Even sharper was his claim that the text was not essentially drafted in Kyiv but in Western capitals, expressing, as he argued, not only the positions of the Ukrainian leadership but also of its Western supporters. According to the Russian reading of events, the letter is part more of a communication strategy of maintaining Western support towards Ukraine rather than of a real effort for a political settlement of the conflict.
Summit of the Coalition of the Willing
Meanwhile the French president Emmanuel Macron, the British prime minister Keir Starmer and the German chancellor Friedrich Merz will meet on Sunday, June 7 in London with Zelensky in order to discuss about the "support to Ukraine " and the "increase of pressure on the war effort of Russia ", as was announced. "This meeting will also allow a review to be made of the work that has been done in favor of a just and viable peace in Ukraine and on the European continent, mainly within the framework of the Coalition of the Willing", the French presidency reports. "The meeting will allow them to continue their close coordination on our common agenda for the continuation of support towards Ukraine and the increase of pressure on the war effort of Russia, as Russia is faced with military, economic and strategic failure and insists unsuccessfully on the front lines in a deadly war", is emphasized in the announcement.
The West and the strategy of prolonged conflict
In Moscow, and not unjustly, the perception prevails that the United States and several Western governments do not have a real motive for an immediate compromise. On the contrary, it is considered that the continuation of the conflict serves geopolitical goals related to the weakening of Russia on an economic, military and diplomatic level. The critics of Western policy argue that the continuous dispatch of weapons, the financial support towards Kyiv and the absence of substantive pressure for immediate negotiations have contributed to the prolongation of the war, increasing the human and economic cost for the whole of Europe. According to this approach, the West chooses to invest in the military dimension of the crisis instead of encouraging a political solution that could lead to a stabilization of the region.
The Russian position on the front: Until the end, we will implement the goals of the special military operation
Putin argued that the Russian forces continue to maintain the initiative of movements in critical sectors of the front and repeated that Moscow considers that its military goals remain achievable. The Russian leadership estimates that time works in its favor, particularly as political and economic pressures increase inside many Western countries that continue to finance the Ukrainian war effort. At the same time, the Kremlin considers that the fatigue of Western public opinion and the disagreements inside NATO and the European Union create an environment more favorable to the Russian positions in comparison with the first stages of the conflict. The latest statements from Moscow capture a reality in which channels of communication remain open, but the political will for substantive progress appears limited. Russia insists that it is ready to examine political solutions, while at the same time it accuses the United States and their Western allies that they prefer the maintenance of pressure and confrontation. On the other side, the West continues to support that the responsibility for the continuation of the war belongs to Moscow. The result is a prolonged diplomatic impasse, in which the prospect of immediate peacemaking remains distant, while the geopolitical consequences of the conflict continue to affect the entire international system.
www.bankingnews.gr
Σχόλια αναγνωστών